18 Comments

User's avatar
Bruce Rubin's avatar

Today’s article was a fascinating read. It took me over an hour to read it and it excites me. I am 83 and I wish I could live to 100 so I could see the results of our space explorations. Thank you.

Scenarica's avatar

"The entire modern space economy hangs on that one flight not blowing up" is the sentence that contextualises everything that follows. Falcon 1 Flight 4 in September 2008, last cash on hand, three consecutive failures behind it. Every company in this guide, every data centre satellite, every space pharmacy, every asteroid miner is downstream of a coin flip that happened in a bunker on Kwajalein Atoll eighteen years ago.

The SpaceX valuation split is the analytical core though. $1 trillion for rockets and Starlink, stretched. The other trillion is a bet on orbital compute. That second trillion requires three things that don't exist yet: chips hardened for radiation at scale, thermal management that works without convection, and a latency architecture that serves real-time workloads from 550km away. Each is a solvable engineering problem. All three solving simultaneously on a timeline that justifies a trillion-dollar premium is a venture bet, not a valuation.

The Europe paragraph should be required reading in Brussels. Launched seven rockets while SpaceX matched that in two weeks. Lost independent launch capability and had to put sovereignty satellites on a competitor's rocket. Same pattern as the AI gap: built by committee, overtaken by iteration.

16 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?